Many brands attempt to inspire their customers by their energy, their purpose or by creating a customer experience that is uplifting. Being inspired is one of the most admired and sought-after brand achievements. What brands have gotten there? And which have disappointed on this dimension? Let’s take a look:

The Most Inspiring Brands of 2018

The new 2018 Prophet Brand Relevance Index® (BRI), having the strength of 299 top brands from over 39 categories, was conducted by Prophet. Respondents, who were active in the category and familiar with the brand, provided some answers to key questions surrounding brand relevance. One of the 16 measures in the survey was “whether the brand inspired me”.  From here we looked at the “inspiring” brands from last year and decided to take another look using the 2018 BRI data.

“Being inspired is one of the most admired and sought-after brand achievements.”

Pinterest, again, was the most inspiring brand. They are on a mission to help people discover the things they love and inspire them to go do those things in their daily lives. It stretches boundaries by fostering a person’s creativity and desire to try something new with projects—an activity such as cooking for kids, decorating a room in your home, building something new, starting a craft, learning a new exercise, creating a social program, with the list going on and on. One is connected with ideas and people that are also interested in this challenge.

Many of the other inspiration-led brands also enable a person to do or learn something.  This includes Food Network (#2), Etsy (#3), Lego (#4), FitBit (#10), NPR (#11) and M.A.C. (#15).  The experience of these brands promises to deliver connection with others, discovering the new, and create a feeling of creative accomplishment or meaning.

3 Key Routes of Inspiring Brands

Three routes are suggested by the other top “inspiring” brands.

1. Providing entertaining stories of role models, real or fictitious, that are inspiring. Pixar at #5, Disney at #6 and Marvel at #9, all provide characters and vicarious experiences that can inspire.
2. Being inspired by the mood or feelings that are put in place. Spotify at #7 and Pandora at #16 create music experiences that can add inspiration to the enjoyment of the moment and even contribute a mindset that leads to excelling in other activities. It is noteworthy that Spotify and Pandora, like Pinterest, also personalize content.
3. Earning status for being inspiring with products, personality, message, and expectations for customers, which is illustrated by #9 Apple and #12 Nike.

The Category Effect on Inspiring Brands

There is also a strong category effect. Some categories, such as apparel (Nike, Zara, Adidas and Victoria’s Secret), or electronics & gaming (Fitbit, Electronic Arts, PlayStation, Xbox, Bose), did well.  Brands in other categories such as insurance, finance, and telecommunication, do not seem to inspire.

Most categories contain differences in the ability of brands to be inspiring. Can you explain these differences?  Should the weaker brands attempt to close the gap?  If so, how should they go about it?

Here are a few interesting notes collected from the data:

• Airlines: Southwest was in the top quarter, while American and United were in the bottom.
• Toys: In general, the toy brands did well, although LEGO and Fisher-Price were decidedly above Hasbro and Mattel.
• Consumer Products: M.A.C. and Dove were in the top quartile, while mature, functional brands like Tide, Crest, Old Spice (despite some creative positioning), Ziploc, Palmolive, Windex, and Kleenex, were in the bottom quartile. A sidenote—Method, Band-Aid, and Clorox, were high on purpose, a closely-related dimension.
• Food: Hershey’s, Betty Crocker, and Ben & Jerry’s, were above or close to the top quartile, while Cheerios, Campbell Soup, Oreo, and Dannon, were found in the lowest quartile.
• Hospitality: The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas and Marriott were in the top quartile, while Carnival Cruise Line, Westin, and Harrah’s, were in the bottom half.
• Drug and Grocery Stores: Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s were in the top quartile, while CVS, Walgreens, Safeway and 7-Eleven appeared in the lowest quartile.
• Durables: KitchenAid was a top 20 brand, while Peloton and Keurig were close. Others like Frigidaire were in the bottom quartile, with Bosch, Haier, and Maytag coming in close.
• Social Media and Internet Services: Although many of these brands have top inspirational scores; Skype, Twitter, Facebook and Yelp were in the bottom half; Yahoo! and Tinder were in the bottom quartile.
• Beverages: Folgers was in the top quartile but Aquafina, Mountain Dew, Monster, Red Bull, Nissan, and Pepsi appeared in the lowest quartile.
• Automobiles: Tesla, Toyota, Honda, and Ford were in the top quartile, but Volkswagen was in the bottom quartile with Mercedes close-by.
• Computing and Software: Apple was a top 20 brand; Sony, Android and Samsung were comfortably in the top quartile. This being said, Huawei, Cortana, Bixby, and Siri were in the bottom quartile.

In most categories, brands aspire to be perceived as innovative. Brands create new value propositions, new brand-driven promotions, and/or new programs to enhance the offering or support shared values. Brand innovation will lend credibility to brand promises and add brand energy, a key element in the quest to be relevant in a dynamic market.

What brands have done just that: created a perception of being innovative? Prophet’s Brand Relevance Index® (BRI) of 2018 provides some answers.

BRI 2018: How Did We Measure Brand Innovation?

In the U.S., the BRI measures the strength of 299 top brands from over 37 categories, among respondents that were active in the category and familiar with the brand.  One of the 16 measures in the survey was “always finding new ways to meet my needs” and provides a measure of perceived innovativeness.

“Brand innovation will lend credibility to brand promises and add brand energy, a key element in the quest to be relevant in a dynamic market.”

Of the top 20 “innovative” brands, 15 of them come from high-tech categories involving computing, software, social media, Internet services, electronics, or gaming.  These brands include, in order, Apple, Android, Pinterest, Google, Samsung, PlayStation, Xbox, Spotify, YouTube, Electronic Arts, Sony, Intel, and Bose.  It is a remarkable testament to how the high-tech world has set a standard for innovation with new features, new offerings, and even new subcategories all happening at a breathtaking speed.

The other five brands, Amazon, Netflix, Nike, Lego, and Fisher-Price, were exceptional for their category on innovation.  Their success reflects how hard it is to be recognized as innovative.

What Makes an Innovative Brand in Key Categories?

The value of this Index and others like it is to make successful role models visible and also provide examples of brands that have struggled.  Learnings can come from each.  Looking at specific categories and comparing winners and losers is instructive.  Consider the following questions and in doing so, keep in mind that the respondents are familiar with the brand and many will be brand users:

• Automobiles: Why are Mercedes, Nissan and Volkswagen in the lowest quartile for innovation while Toyota, Honda and Chevrolet are in the highest?
• Restaurants: Why is Chick-fil-A in the top quartile and KFC in the bottom?  And why are In-N-Out Burger and Shake Shack in the bottom quartile?
• Media: Why are they all in the bottom quartile and, within that group, why are CNN, Huffington Post and USA Today significantly below the others?
• Retail Banking and Investments: Brands in this group emphasize innovation but have only two brands that are even in the top half on “innovativeness”: Capital One and Fidelity, and five brands that are in the bottom 10%, Schwab, TD Ameritrade, U.S. Bank, Lending Tree, HSBC. Why are these brands unable to communicate their innovations?
• Clothing: Why are Zara and The North Face in the top quartile while H&M and Patagonia in the bottom quartile?
• Appliances: Why is KitchenAid a top ten innovation brand?  Why are most of the rest in the bottom half of the innovativeness ratings?
• Personal Assistant: Why is Alexa well above Siri on innovativeness while Cortana and Bixby are significantly lower ranked?
• Hotels: Why are Marriott and Hilton high on innovativeness and substantially above Holiday Inn, Hyatt, and Westin?
• Technology: Why are some technology brands like Twitter, LinkedIn and IBM Watson relatively low on innovativeness?

What emerges from such an exercise are some aha insights and some mysteries that can end up being the most instructive of all.

As described in my book “Creating Signature Stories,” a signature story is a “Once upon a time…” narrative describing an experience or relationship that represents who you are as an organization, a narrative that jumps out of the clutter, communicates externally and internally, and is worth sharing. It is significantly more effective than merely describing programs, reciting facts or making logical arguments at gaining attention, changing perceptions, inspiring, persuading and energizing. Not 20% better, but 200% or 300% better. The numbers are just amazing.

Common Mistakes When Creating Signature Stories

So why are so few organizations using signature stories effectively to communicate their strategic messaging – their purpose, culture, value proposition, or strategic programs? There are six common mistakes that occur.

No signature stories at all

The biggest mistake by far is to simply not participate, to not make signature stories a part of the communication effort. There may be references to customers or employees but it is not a “draw me in” narrative. Why? Following the communication brief, describing rather than telling stories seems efficient and logical. The implicit and erroneous assumption is that the audience is rational and will be persuaded by sound logic. Plus, there are usually several communication tasks that fit into a bullet point list but not into any one story. It can also be discouraging trying to find great stories – but the benefit is huge.

No pop

Signature stories that are put out there often simply do not pop. They do not have the intimacy, emotion or interest intensity to break out and be shared. It may be that the offering does not provide material or there are no higher purpose programs that can support great stories. Or there are effective stories, but the effort to find them is lacking or the story heroes may be reluctant to share details. In any case, the stories are shallow and uninvolving.

“Signature stories should be part of any communication program but they will not happen or be effective alone. There needs to be an understanding, resources, and effort behind them.”

Bad presentation

They are not professionally developed because the value of presentation is not recognized or there is a perceived budget limitation. Relying on customers or employees to create a signature story presentation is almost always a recipe for presentation issues. A good presentation cannot help a weak story, but a strong story can be rendered ineffective with a bad presentation. It’s far better to reduce the number of stories and invest in a professional quality presentation.

Stories hidden in a box

Signature stories might be there but are hidden away in a box all by themselves. That means that they will not be accessed by most of the audience. Worse, it means that they are not driving the key communication tasks. The best use of a signature story is to introduce and motivate a communication objective, or to provide an illustration or proof point of communication task. Neither is possible if the stories are organized in their own box.

Story overload

Having many signature stories can provide freshness, energy, visibility, depth, breadth and texture. But there is a tipping point after which there are too many signature stories for employees to manage or for customers to grasp, and they are just overwhelmed. Story overload can make signature stories ineffective when many of the stories are weak and there is no ability to prioritize stories and let the stars shine.

Organizational support is lacking

Signature stories, especially in B2B firms, are born through a process that needs to involve an organizational story unit including editors and videographers that can produce story depth, execute professional presentations and deploy both internally and externally using outlets such as podcasts and social. The organization also needs a story culture that motivates the development of signature stories.

In my book “Creating Signature Stories,” the power of storytelling is applied to strategic messaging to energize, persuade and inspire. The use of signature stories is particularly relevant to B2B firms because their customers are buying a relationship with an organization and communicating organizational values and a brand vision with authenticity is critical.

However, the nature of signature stories and the process of developing and using them is different for B2B firms. Which raises the question: What are the challenges of using signature stories in B2B firms and how can they be addressed?

Creating Great B2B Signature Stories

In B2B, especially when external commination is involved, customer success stories are often the best vehicles for signature stories. This leads to three specific challenges. The first is to find or create signature stories that are truly intriguing, authentic and engaging. The second involves story overload. It’s important to make sure you don’t have too many stories and overwhelm your audience. Third is to create an organizational structure and process to find and use signature stories.

Make them intriguing

In a B2C context, it is easier to find stories with emotion, tension and connection with characters. In contrast, B2B customer success signature stories tend to be more oriented to functional benefits and processes. To become intriguing, look for ways to dramatize the problem description, the solution or the outcome.

• Problem. The context might be so dire that it intrigues. Lou Gerstner’s turn-around story started with a failing IBM that was going to be split into seven firms. There was a “how can this be fixed?” feel that intrigued me.
• Solution. A solution that is dramatically creative grabs your attention. One of Prophet’s customer stories showcases how T-Mobile redefined the industry with its Un-carrier strategy. In an industry with little differentiation and disliked policies, the new strategy shocked the entire category.
• Outcome. An outcome that is quantified and eye-opening can intrigue. In 2012, Barclays was one of the least trusted brands in one of the least trusted industries. The company used stories to improve its image. By showing improvement in trust and other relevant measures of 35% and more in comparison to prior fact-based efforts that made zero impact, they created a macro story that attracted attention.

Be authentic

The audience should not feel like they are being sold to when reading or hearing your story to the point where they say, “I understand why you want me to learn about this case because it showcases what you do, but it provides no information that would help or interest me.” The story needs to be strong enough to divert your thoughts away from feeling that this is another selling effort.

“Having many signature stories can provide freshness, energy, visibility, depth, breadth and texture.”

The authenticity and “being intriguing” challenges become greater when the customer resists allowing you to dramatize or at least tell the complete problem story, the process behind the solution, or the numbers behind the outcome. They might be embarrassed about the problem or feel there are trade secrets at risk. The result can be a shallow story with the punch removed. A watered-down story is not going to have an impact.

Be relevant

People’s ears perk up if the story is similar to or resonates with their problem, their industry, or a firm like theirs. Having many stories available will increase the chances of having one – or several – that are relevant to your audience. Just be careful not to get to the point of story overload.

Signature Story Overload

Having many signature stories can provide freshness, energy, visibility, depth, breadth and texture. But there is a tipping point after which there are too many stories for employees to manage or for customers to grasp.

What can be done about overload?

• Screening. Put simply, some stories don’t qualify as great or useful. Those should not make the list or are candidates for removal.
• Prioritize. For Prophet, a few signature stories rise to top because of their content, which intrigues and reinforces their strategic message.
• A composite story. Sometimes a composite story that incorporates some of the experiences of several customers can work.
• Synergy. Together, a group of overlapping stories should provide more depth and impact than any single story can do on its own. That means thinking of a story’s role in a signature story cluster.
• A story bank. A story bank that is easily accessible with stories coded so that those needing a story can find the one most relevant can help make the multiple stories an asset.

Organizational Support

Signature stories do not just appear, especially in B2B firms. They are born through a process that needs to involve both motivation and organizational support.

Motivation

Motivation comes from expectations driven by the culture, with recognition programs and performance evaluations. It can involve contests. Mobil, before its merger with Exxon, had a contest to find the best stories around three values: leadership, partnership and trust. The winners got to be on the infield in the Indy 500. There were over 300 entrants and a host of great signature stories emerged.

A signature story organizational unit

An organizational team or person charged with curating, evaluating and refining signature stories can be the place an employee turns to when a potential signature story surfaces. They can also take on the roles of “reporters” and seek out signature stories. With designers, videographers and editors this person can refine stories, provide and execute presentation options and find outlets such as podcasts, trade press, video media outlets as well as internal communication opportunities.

What makes an effective signature story – is it one that attracts attention, connects, communicates, is remembered and changes behavior in some way? There is no checklist of story attributes: each great story has its own content and style that come together to impact the listener. However, the definition of a signature story, an intriguing, involving narrative with a strategic message, provides some guiding questions.

Is the Signature Story Intriguing?

Does it grab your attention? Is it thought-provoking, novel, informative, inspiring, exceptionally relevant, humorous and/or awe-creating? If it does not score highly on one or more of these dimensions, it will not gain attention and is thus not a good candidate for a signature story.

“Each great story has its own content and style that come together to impact the listener.”

Consider the story that begins,  “It was a drab and rainy day in mid-May 1931 when the 28-year-old Neil McElroy, the advertising manager of P&G’s Camay soap, sat down at his Royal typewriter and wrote perhaps the most significant memo in modern marketing history.”  Doesn’t that perk up your ears? Why the memo? Why was it important? Who is this guy? What happened to him?  You are instantly drawn in.

Is the Signature Story Authentic?

Do the settings, characters and challenges feel real? Or is the story likely to be perceived as phony, contrived or a transparent selling effort? Is there substance behind the story and its message?

A Skype signature story features Sarah from Indiana and Paige from New Zealand, each born without half of a left arm. Their mothers wanted them to get to know each other, but how do you have a relationship when so far apart? The solution is to use Skype to connect daily so the girls could share their experiences and create a deep friendship. Skype later brought the two girls to New York, where they had an emotional meeting. The authenticity of Sarah and Paige and their story helped to build an emotional response.

Is the Signature Story Involving?

Does it draw people in? Does it make you care? Does a story stimulate a cognitive response, such as a belief change, or an emotional response, such as feelings of warmth or awe? Will it cause the viewer to act—maybe by passing along the story to others? A weak, shallow signature story is likely to result in a passive audience.

Knorr was trying to determine flavor preferences and asked people to have a foodie date with someone they had not previously met, but who had a similar flavor personality as measured by a flavor profiler. The proviso was that they had to feed their partners – no eating on their own. A video of seven participating couples offered fun, humor and many tender moments, and helped generate 100 million views. The audience was drawn into the awkward meeting, the test and the resulting relationships, ultimately creating a signature story for the brand.

Signature stories help organizations with a higher purpose (a purpose beyond just increasing sales and profits) in two ways. First, signature stories communicate the higher purpose and its programs to employees and customers, an increasingly important and difficult job. Second, the stories serve to provide needed visibility, energy and brand enhancement to organizations that have trouble breaking through when talking about their offering.

Most organizations have realized that they need a higher purpose-built into or alongside their business purpose. Employees, especially millennials, need a reason to come to work besides increasing sales and profits and getting a paycheck. They want to respect and admire their firm and want their jobs to provide meaning in their lives. A higher purpose can address these needs—and bolster productivity—by offering an energizing common goal.

Customers, too, want to have a relationship with brands and organizations they respect because of shared values and meaningful programs that address social or environmental challenges. When the shared beliefs are strong, these customers impact the marketplace with their loyalty and support.

“When the shared beliefs are strong, these customers impact the marketplace with their loyalty and support.”

The challenge is not only to create a higher purpose with supporting programs but to communicate it to employees and customers. A signature story can do that better than a factual description because it connects emotionally which strengthens the message and relationship.

A second challenge is to elevate the visibility, energy and perceptions for the brand, a difficult and sometimes impossible task when the offering is not newsworthy, and very few are. It was always hard to make a branded soap, bank, or airline interesting.  In a time of media clutter and audience control of content, it becomes even more challenging. A higher purpose and associated programs can provide stories that can break through, can touch with emotion, can create high levels of visibility and energy, and can even inspire employees and customers. It is hard to create impactful stores in the absence of a higher purpose.

How Lifebuoy’s Higher Purpose Made an Impact

Consider Lifebuoy, a leading soap brand in much of the world, with a higher purpose of reducing childhood fatalities from water-borne illnesses by changing handwashing habits. Their “Help a Child Reach 5” program was rolled out with dozens of events and promotions. Schoolchildren in class, for example, received child-friendly materials including comics, songs, games and rewards, to help them sustain effective handwashing habits. The phrase “Did you wash your hands with Lifebuoy today?” was placed on over 2.5 million pieces of roti, a flatbread, during a Hindu holiday.

Videos were made of three villages that were early participants of the program. In one video, we are introduced to Utari, a woman who spends time near a tree. She waters it, dances next to it, shoos water buffalo away from it, places a ribbon around it and stays with it into the night when others are otherwise engaged. Why? In the middle of the video, her husband reminds her that tomorrow is a big day—her son will turn 5. Then we learn that it is a village custom to mark a tree when a child is born and to track that marking as the child grows up. After five years, many mothers have lost their child and have only the tree left. Utari is one of the lucky ones, and her celebration of the tree is a way to reflect that gratitude.

The three videos received over 44 million views and helped Lifebuoy toward its goal of changing the handwashing habits of a billion people by 2020, potentially preventing 600,000 child deaths a year. But the video also elevated the Lifebuoy brand by engendering respect, liking and a sense of shared values. The videos were powerful in part because they had an authentic central character, some curiosity-raising tension, and the backbone of an inspirational and effective program to tackle a global problem. Engaged listeners were directly connected to Lifebuoy.

Stories work better than facts. A set of facts are often ignored or treated as self-serving with claims that are not credible. Consider the remarkable impact of some signature stories at Barclays, which had become the least trusted brand in the least trusted industry and need to repair their image.

Barclays – How a Brand Regains Trust

Barclays is a role model for how to use stories in a brand crisis to regain trust and change the conversation. The Barclays brand, which had suffered from the 2008 financial meltdown, was later damaged by accusations that Barclays and other banks had manipulated key interest rates. The trust level for Barclays in Britain in 2012 was well below that of its competitors. It is not a stretch to conclude that Barclays was the least trusted brand in the least trusted sector in the UK. Barclays in response announced a new brand purpose: “Helping people achieve their ambitions—in the right way” and organized efforts to get their 140,000 employees on board.

Employee-Inspired Higher Purpose Programs

The newly empowered and inspired Barclays employees created and led dozens of higher-purpose programs on their own. One, the Digital Eagles, is an internal group that grew to over 17,000 employees. Its mission is to teach the public about surviving and even thriving in the digital world. Stories about how Digital Eagles projects affected real people helped shine a light on the higher-purpose initiatives at Barclays.

One story featured Steve Rich, a sports development officer, who had lost his ability to play football (soccer to Americans) because of a car accident. But he could participate in “walking football”—usually played with a team of six on a small field with no running—which enabled him to again experience the joy of the sport. Wanting to help others do the same, he decided to raise awareness of walking football and turn it into a nationwide game in Britain. With the help of Digital Eagles, Rich created a website that connected over 400 teams across the country–and connected individuals with teams. It also helped Rich get in touch with some former football mates. He is partly responsible for the growing interest the sport has generated as reflected in the emergence of a national tournament. His accomplishments and personal regeneration is inspiring indeed.

“The new campaign drove six times as much change in trust and five times as much change in consideration as the product-focused campaign that preceded it.”

Employees were inspired and energized by the programs driven by the new brand’s purpose. And customers and prospective customers changed their perceptions of Barclays. From the start of the campaign to tell signature stories about the Digital Eagles and other programs in the summer of 2014 until early 2016, trust was up 33 percent, consideration was up 130 percent, the emotional connection was up 35 percent (versus 5 percent for the category average) and “reassurance that your finances are secure” was up 46 percent. The new campaign drove six times as much change in trust and five times as much change in consideration as the product-focused campaign that preceded it. By 2015, Barclays received 5,000 positive mentions in the press.

How Do Signature Stories Persuade?

Stories get heard and change minds. More particularly, stories like those used by Barclays, persuade because they:

1. Attract attention.

When a speaker says, “Let me start with a story,” your attention shifts and focuses. But when a speaker talks in the abstract, communicating only facts without a story, your attention wanders. It just does. Customers and employees are seldom interested in your facts. Stories fare best when they are engaging from the outset, have detail that allows you to visualize and empathize, and have a fresh and intriguing storyline.

 2. Inhibit counter-arguing.

The power of the story can distract the recipient and can reduce the tendency to confront or counter the facts shared. Since the messaging isn’t contradicted or refuted, it’s more likely to be processed and accepted. As a result, storytelling is especially effective when attempting change or when softening negative positions—the task that Barclays faced.

3. Involve an authentic, credible and likeable storyteller – one who doesn’t relay dry facts.

By simply telling a story, a brand spokesperson can deliver a point without being perceived as phony, contrived or a commercial selling vehicle.

4. Allow people to deduce logic themselves.

We know from research and common sense that self-discovery is much more powerful than having people talk at you. The Barclays stories suggest to the audience about the values and priorities of the organization. The audience needs to make the leap to perceptions of trust on their own. There wasn’t anyone explicitly telling customers to trust Barclays.

5. Are remembered.

Stories are remembered more than facts because the story recipient is more attentive and involved than the same person receiving a recitation of facts. In addition, the story arc provides a way to organize information and becomes, in essence, one thing to remember rather than a set of facts.

6. Are shared.

Gaining the attention of one audience also offers the possibility of reaching others—via social media. This can multiply the exposed population—and send some stories into viral territory. Passing along a signature story also enhances its ability to gain and keep attention. You are likely to spend time with a story if someone you respect and consider unbiased is delivering and/or endorsing it. That source is often putting his or her reputation on the line, so you will probably approach the story with a positive attitude.

We spend a lot of time talking about what makes a story, but what is not a story? For over two years I became intrigued by the power of storytelling applied to strategic messaging. The difficulty of defining what is not a story becomes a serious conceptual problem. I had many patient discussions (well, not always patient!) with my daughter Jennifer, a Stanford GSB professor, who has done extensive research and teaching on storytelling.

What Is and Is Not a Brand Signature Story?

We found a conceptual breakthrough: a set of facts is NOT a signature story. That idea broke the dam and allowed our work and my book, “Creating Signature Stories,” to proceed. A signature story as we defined it is a “Once about a time” narrative that portrays actual or fictitious events or experiences with a beginning, middle, and end (not always portrayed in that order) that provides an organizing framework for its components and implications. The signature story often has explicit or implied emotional content and detailed sensory information as well.

A signature story as I define it here is not a description of facts. It may incorporate or communicate facts but does so in the context of the narrative. The facts might be integrated into the narrative and must be deduced by the audience. Facts could appear after the narrative to add elaboration and credibility. Or the narrative could be used to add depth and meaning to facts already presented. But facts by themselves are not a story.

To illustrate the problem, think of executives that eagerly tell you their brand story. What they usually mean by that is to address questions like:

• What does the brand stand for?
• Who are its customer targets?
• What is its value proposition for each segment?
• What is the point of difference?
• What organizational values or core programs or policies provide substance and clarity to the brand?

Brand Facts Do Not Communicate a Brand’s Signature Story

Answers to such questions almost always involve lists of facts. These fact lists should be perused, as they provide a solid underpinning for a brand vision and business strategy that will drive success. They should be crystal clear and communicated. But communicating a list of facts, efficient though it may seem, is difficult and sometimes impossible as people are simply not interested. In fact, such a fact set is often perceived as boring rather than intriguing, as conveying puffery instead of authenticity, and is too similar to comparable lists from other organizations to be engaging. Even if an audience’s attention is obtained, they will perceive the communication to be biased and self-serving. 

“Fact lists should be perused, as they provide a solid underpinning for a brand vision and business strategy that will drive success.”

Brand Signature Stories Make Strong Statements

Suppose a firm with quality issues asserted to employees and customers about their “new quality” priority. It would be likely greeted with disinterest and skepticism. Compare with the power of the following true story that is now a signature story: Zhang Ruimin was promoted in 1984 to lead a then-struggling Chinese refrigerator manufacturer that would later be renamed Haier.

After a customer brought in a faulty refrigerator, Zhang and the customer went through his inventory of 400 refrigerators –only to find that nearly 20 percent were defective. A defining moment. Zhang promptly had the 76 bad refrigerators lined up on the factory floor and asked employees to destroy them all with sledgehammers. A dramatic decision that led to a change in the firm’s culture and reputation. It also became a platform from which Haier become a leading appliance maker in the global marketplace. The story was and is a big part of Haier’s success and one of the original sledgehammers is enshrined at the home office.

My new book Creating Signature Stores emerged because of an idea spawned by three powerful forces:

• The critical need to communicate strategic messages
• The growing difficulty of doing so
• The new realization that stories are powerful communicators

The Idea: Applying the Power of Storytelling to Strategic Messaging

Strategic messaging has never been more important, both internally and externally. Internally, employees are searching for and often insisting on meaning in their professional lives. (The why? question.) Providing an answer involves communicating the values, culture, customer value proposition and strategy of the firm. Externally, there is a growing segment of customers that are willing and sometimes eager to have a relationship with brands that they admire and share their values. Strategic messaging can create or support such relationships.

Why Is Communicating Strategic Messages So Hard?

It is largely because customers and employees are often not that interested in your message so they tune it out. Even when the message gets processed, it is often viewed as lacking authenticity and credibility. In addition, there is the challenge of media clutter and the realities of the social world with an empowered audience. As a result, it is hard to break through.

Why Stories Are More Impactful Than Facts

In the context of this challenging communication task, the knowledge that stories are amazingly more impactful than facts becomes very relevant.  Hundreds if not thousands of studies have confirmed that assertion. Stories provide a way to break through all the distractions, disinterest and content overload and make an audience take notice, stay engaged, change perceptions, be inspired, and remember. People perk up when they hear someone say, “Let me tell you a story.”  If you have facts to communicate, your best strategy is telling it via a story that allows the ultimate message to emerge.

Example: Nordstrom’s Authenticity

Consider the classic Nordstrom story, which brings to life the firm’s policy of employee empowerment and prioritizing customers. A customer in the mid-1970s walked into it Fairbanks, Alaska clothing store and asked to “return” two worn snow tires.

An awkward moment! Nordstrom, of course, did not sell tires (although the store site was once a tire store). But, the salesperson that had only been on the job for a few weeks had no doubt about what to do. He promptly took back the tires and refunded what the customer said he had paid. This story is told to this day because it is simply so intriguing and authentic.

How to Create Intriguing, Authentic & Strategic Messages

The idea is to apply the power of stories to strategic messaging through “signature stories.” Create intriguing, authentic and involving narratives that include a strategic message. A signature story is not simply a set of facts but can motivate facts that support the message. It differs from tactical messaging in that it involves communicating the brand vision, organizational values and culture, a business strategy, or a value proposition with a long-term perspective.

“If you have facts to communicate, your best strategy is telling it via a story that allows the ultimate message to emerge.”